To make it easier to tell which PDF.js version/commit that the *built* files correspond to, they have (since many years) included `pdfjsVersion` and `pdfjsBuild` constants with that information.
As currently implemented this has a few shortcomings:
- It requires manually adding the code, with its preprocessor statements, in all relevant files.
- It requires ESLint disable statements, since it's obviously unused code.
- Being unused, this code is removed in the minified builds.
- This information would be more appropriate as comments, however Babel discards all comments during building.
- It would be helpful to have this information at the top of the *built* files, however it's being moved during building.
To address all of these issues, we'll instead utilize Webpack to insert the version/commit information as a comment placed just after the license header.
In Webpack version `5.99.0` the way that `export` statements are handled was changed slightly, with much less boilerplate code being generated, which unfortunately breaks our `tweakWebpackOutput` function that's used to expose the exported properties globally and that e.g. the viewer depends upon.
Given that we were depending on formatting that should most likely be viewed as nothing more than an internal implementation detail in Webpack, we instead work-around this by manually defining the structures that were previously generated.
Obviously this will lead to a tiny bit more manual work in the future, however we don't change the API-surface often enough that it should be a big issue *and* the relevant unit-tests are updated such that it shouldn't be possible to break this.
*NOTE:* In the future we might want to consider no longer using global properties like this, and instead rely only on proper `export`s throughout the code-base.
However changing this would likely be non-trivial (given edge-cases), and it'd be an `api-major` change, so let's just do the minimal amount of work to unblock Webpack updates for now.
Having just tested PR 17337 locally I noticed that especially the `JpxImage`-test causes a "ridiculous" amount of warning messages to be printed, which doesn't seem helpful.
Given that only actual `Error`s should be relevant here, we can easily disable this logging during the tests.
There's built-in ESLint rule, see `sort-imports`, to ensure that all `import`-statements are sorted alphabetically, since that often helps with readability.
Unfortunately there's no corresponding rule to sort `export`-statements alphabetically, however there's an ESLint plugin which does this; please see https://www.npmjs.com/package/eslint-plugin-sort-exports
The only downside here is that it's not automatically fixable, but the re-ordering is a one-time "cost" and the plugin will help maintain a *consistent* ordering of `export`-statements in the future.
*Note:* To reduce the possibility of introducing any errors here, the re-ordering was done by simply selecting the relevant lines and then using the built-in sort-functionality of my editor.
In order to eventually get rid of SystemJS and start using native `import`s instead, we'll need to provide "complete" file identifiers since otherwise there'll be MIME type errors when attempting to use `import`.
Note that Prettier, purposely, has only limited [configuration options](https://prettier.io/docs/en/options.html). The configuration file is based on [the one in `mozilla central`](https://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/source/.prettierrc) with just a few additions (to avoid future breakage if the defaults ever changes).
Prettier is being used for a couple of reasons:
- To be consistent with `mozilla-central`, where Prettier is already in use across the tree.
- To ensure a *consistent* coding style everywhere, which is automatically enforced during linting (since Prettier is used as an ESLint plugin). This thus ends "all" formatting disussions once and for all, removing the need for review comments on most stylistic matters.
Many ESLint options are now redundant, and I've tried my best to remove all the now unnecessary options (but I may have missed some).
Note also that since Prettier considers the `printWidth` option as a guide, rather than a hard rule, this patch resorts to a small hack in the ESLint config to ensure that *comments* won't become too long.
*Please note:* This patch is generated automatically, by appending the `--fix` argument to the ESLint call used in the `gulp lint` task. It will thus require some additional clean-up, which will be done in a *separate* commit.
(On a more personal note, I'll readily admit that some of the changes Prettier makes are *extremely* ugly. However, in the name of consistency we'll probably have to live with that.)
Please note that the standalone `pdf.image_decoders.js` file will be including the complete `src/shared/util.js` file, despite only using parts of it.[1] This was done *purposely*, to not negatively impact the readability/maintainability of the core PDF.js code.
Furthermore, to ensure that the compatibility is the same in the regular PDF.js library *and* in the the standalone image decoders, `src/shared/compatibility.js` was included as well.
To (hopefully) prevent future complaints about the size of the built `pdf.image_decoders.js` file, a few existing async-related polyfills are being skipped (since all of the image decoders are completely synchronous).
Obviously this required adding a couple of pre-processor statements, but given that these are all limited to "compatibility" code, I think this might be OK!?
---
[1] However, please note that previous commits moved `PageViewport` and `MessageHandler` out of `src/shared/util.js` which reduced its size.