The helper function was used in a number of places, but also a lot of
places contained the annotation selector string inline. This commit
makes sure that all places use `getAnnotationSelector` consistently to
make sure the annotation selector string is only defined in a single
place and to improve readability of the test code.
This is a temporary measure to reduce noise until #20136 is fixed. Note
that this shouldn't be an issue in terms of coverage because we still
run the test on Linux.
It's useful for users highlighting with NVDA.
They've to enable native selection and then selection some text.
In this case only a selectionchange is triggered once the selection is done.
It takes some time for the viewer alert to be updated after the editor
is committed, but the current tests don't await that and proceed too
fast to the viewer alert string assertion. This commit fixes the issue
by waiting for the expected viewer alert string to appear instead.
The `Page.evaluate()` and `Mouse.click()` APIs in Puppeteer both return
a promise; see https://pptr.dev/api/puppeteer.page.evaluate and
https://pptr.dev/api/puppeteer.mouse.click, and should therefore be
awaited before proceeding in tests to make sure that the test's behavior
is deterministic and avoid intermittent failures.
The following command was used to find potential places to fix:
`grep -nEr "[^await|return] page\." test/integration/*`
This integration test fails intermittently because the undo button can
only be activated if focus can be put on it, and that in turn can only
happen if it's visible. The test tried to make sure that the undo bar
is visible, but checking for the absence of the `hidden` attribute is
unfortunately not enough to assert visibility according to Puppeteer
documentation [1]. Moreover, the undo button wasn't checked at all.
To fix the issue we let Puppeteer do the visibility detection for the
undo bar by providing the `visible: true` option to `waitForSelector`
[2]. This is consistent with the other tests that already do this, and
also with the existing code that detects if the undo bar is hidden
(which uses the `hidden: true` option of `waitForSelector`). Moreover,
we wait for the undo button to be present before putting focus on it.
For consistency, and to avoid intermittent failures elsewhere, we mirror
this solution to the other undo bar/button tests of the various editors.
[1] https://pptr.dev/api/puppeteer.elementhandle.isvisible
[2] https://pptr.dev/api/puppeteer.waitforselectoroptions
To avoid being able to introduce dependencies between tests this commit
makes sure that we close the document between tests so that we can't
accidentally rely on state set by a previous test.
This replaces the various copies of this logic with a single helper that
we template for each editor type, similar to what we already do for the
`switchToEditor` helper.
This pattern was already followed quite consistently outside of the
freetext editor integration tests, so this commit aligns the remaining
places for consistency. This also helps to make the tests more compact
and to reduce the number of changes in follow-up changes.
In most integration tests we already use the pattern of defining the
editor selector once and reusing it in the rest of the test, but it's
not fully consistent everywhere yet. This commit fixes that for the
highlight editor integration tests, which has multiple advantages:
- it improves consistency between the various editor integration tests;
- it removes duplicate function calls and aligns variable definitions;
- it reduces the number of `getEditorSelector` calls that contained
hardcoded IDs, which helps to isolate the tests and to simplify
follow-up patches.
With the changes in PR 18843 the `AnnotationEditorUIManager.prototype.updateMode` method is now asynchronous, which we need to take into account when dispatching the "annotationeditormodechanged" event.
This has multiple advantages:
- it improves consistency between the various editor integration tests;
- it makes the code easier to read/understand;
- it reduces code duplication.
This commit applies the `waitForUnselectedEditor` helper function to the
remaining places, that most likely predate the introduction of the
helper function, to deduplicate the code and to have a unified way of
checking if a given editor is unselected.
The idea is to insert a span in the text layer with an aria-role set to img
and use the bounding box provided by the attribute field in the tag dict in
order to have non-null dimensions for the image to make it "visible".
In PR #18574 setting `window.uiManager` was moved into the `src` folder
to avoid intermittent integration test failures because at the time we
lacked a way to register event listeners early (before PDF.js loads).
However, in PR #18617 this functionality got introduced, so we can now
use the new way of setting up the event bus in the tests to move this
back to the `test` folder again and to reduce the amount of test-only
code in the main codebase as discussed in PR #18574.
Partially reverts e037c5711d3d2413669e9b6c275986adf24a295b.
The function evaluateOnNewDocument in Puppeteer allow us to execute some js before the pdf.js one
is loaded.
It allows us to stub some setters before there are used and then set some event handlers very soon.
Switching to an editing mode can be asynchronous (e.g. if an editable annotation exists on a
visible page), so we must add a new editor only when the page rendering is done.
When the mouse was hovering an existing highlight, all the text in the page
was selected.
So when the user is selecting some text or drawing a free highlight, the mouse
is disabled for the existing editors.
Because of editor z-index, the toolbar belonging to an highlight created
before a second adjacent one, can be overlapped by this new one.
So when the user select an editor we just show it on front of all the other
ones to make sure that it can be used normally.
Over time the number of integration tests that get the rectangle for a
given selector has increased quite a bit, and the code to do so has
consequently become duplicated.
This commit refactors the integration tests to move the rectangle
fetching code to a single place, which reduces the code by over 400
lines and makes the individual tests simpler.
When seleciting on a touch screen device, whenever the finger moves to a
blank area (so over `div.textLayer` directly rather than on a `<span>`),
the selection jumps to include all the text between the beginning of the
.textLayer and the selection side that is not being moved.
The existing selection flickering fix when using the mouse cannot be
trivially re-used on mobile, because when modifying a selection on
a touchscreen device Firefox will not emit any pointer event (and
Chrome will emit them inconsistently). Instead, we have to listen to the
'selectionchange' event.
The fix is different in Firefox and Chrome:
- on Firefox, we have to make sure that, when modifying the selection,
hovering on blank areas will hover on the .endOfContent element
rather than on the .textLayer element. This is done by adjusting the
z-indexes so that .endOfContent is above .textLayer.
- on Chrome, hovering on blank areas needs to trigger hovering on an
element that is either immediately after (or immediately before,
depending on which side of the selection the user is moving) the
currently selected text. This is done by moving the .endOfContent
element around between the correct `<span>`s in the text layer.
The new anti-flickering code is also used when selecting using a mouse:
the improvement in Firefox is only observable on multi-page selection,
while in Chrome it also affects selection within a single page.
After this commit, the `z-index`es inside .textLayer are as follows:
- .endOfContent has `z-index: 0`
- everything else has `z-index: 1`
- except for .markedContent, which have `z-index: 0`
and their contents have `z-index: 1`.
`.textLayer` has an explicit `z-index: 0` to introduce a new stacking context,
so that its contents are not drawn on top of `.annotationLayer`.
This commit replaces `waitForFunction` calls that use
`document.activeElement` to wait for an element to get focus by simpler
`waitForSelector` expressions that use the `:focus` selector. Note that
we already use this in other tests, so this improves consistency too.
