*Note:* This borrows a helper function from the viewer, however the code cannot be directly shared since the worker-thread has access to various primitives.
The code was added in order to guess if an editor has been moved but
it's simpler to just set a variable when it's dragged or moved with
the keyboard. This way we remove a bit of asynchronicity.
This replaces our custom `PromiseCapability`-class with the new native `Promise.withResolvers()` functionality, which does *almost* the same thing[1]; please see https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Promise/withResolvers
The only difference is that `PromiseCapability` also had a `settled`-getter, which was however not widely used and the call-sites can either be removed or re-factored to avoid it. In particular:
- In `src/display/api.js` we can tweak the `PDFObjects`-class to use a "special" initial data-value and just compare against that, in order to replace the `settled`-state.
- In `web/app.js` we change the only case to manually track the `settled`-state, which should hopefully be OK given how this is being used.
- In `web/pdf_outline_viewer.js` we can remove the `settled`-checks, since the code should work just fine without it. The only thing that could potentially happen is that we try to `resolve` a Promise multiple times, which is however *not* a problem since the value of a Promise cannot be changed once fulfilled or rejected.
- In `web/pdf_viewer.js` we can remove the `settled`-checks, since the code should work fine without them:
- For the `_onePageRenderedCapability` case the `settled`-check is used in a `EventBus`-listener which is *removed* on its first (valid) invocation.
- For the `_pagesCapability` case the `settled`-check is used in a print-related helper that works just fine with "only" the other checks.
- In `test/unit/api_spec.js` we can change the few relevant cases to manually track the `settled`-state, since this is both simple and *test-only* code.
---
[1] In browsers/environments that lack native support, note [the compatibility data](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Promise/withResolvers#browser_compatibility), it'll be polyfilled via the `core-js` library (but only in `legacy` builds).
The original bug was because the parent was null when trying to show
an highlight annotation which led to an exception.
That led me to think about having some null/non-null parent when removing
an editor: it's a mess especially if a destroyed parent is still attached
to an editor. Consequently, this patch always sets the parent to null when
deleting the editor.
The following are some highlights of this patch:
- In the Worker we only extract a *subset* of the potential contents of the `Usage` dictionary, to avoid having to implement/test a bunch of code that'd be completely unused in the viewer.
- In order to still allow the user to *manually* override the default visible layers in the viewer, the viewable/printable state is purposely *not* enforced during initialization in the `OptionalContentConfig` constructor.
- Printing will now always use the *default* visible layers, rather than using the same state as the viewer (as was the case previously).
This ensures that the printing-output will correctly take the `Usage` dictionary into account, and in practice toggling of visible layers rarely seem to be necessary except in the viewer itself (if at all).[1]
---
[1] In the unlikely case that it'd ever be deemed necessary to support fine-grained control of optional content visibility during printing, some new (additional) UI would likely be needed to support that case.
In implementing caret browsing mode in pdf.js, I didn't notice that selectstart isn't always triggered.
So this patch removes the use of selectstart and rely only on selectionchange.
In order to simplify the selection management, the selection code is moved in the AnnotationUIManager:
- it simplifies the code;
- it allows to have only one listener for selectionchange instead of having one by visible page
for selectstart.
I had to add a delay in the integration tests for highlighting (there's a comment with an explanation),
it isn't really nice, but it's the only way I found and in real life there always is a delay between
press and release.
