After clicking the find button we need to wait for the input field to
appear before we try to type in it, but instead we were waiting for the
button to appear. However, the button is always present, so the current
`waitForSelector` call is basically a no-op, and this can cause the
integration tests to fail intermittently if we continue before the
input field is actually visible.
This appears to be due a typo first introduced in commit
d10da907dac86c103b787127110a59aed82c7aaa that has been copy/pasted.
This commit fixes the issue by waiting for the input field to be visible
before we continue typing in it.
The problem in the original code is that `getTextAt` is called too
early and therefore returns unexpected text content. This can happen
because we call `increaseScale` and then wait for the page's text layer
to be visible, but it can take some time before the zoom actually
occurs/completes in the viewer and in the meantime the old (pre-zoom)
text layer may still be visible, causing us to continue too soon because
we don't validate that we're dealing with the post-zoom text layer.
This commit fixes the issue by simply waiting for the expected text to
show up at the given origin coordinates, which makes the test work
independent of viewer actions/timing.
The `Page.evaluate()` and `Mouse.click()` APIs in Puppeteer both return
a promise; see https://pptr.dev/api/puppeteer.page.evaluate and
https://pptr.dev/api/puppeteer.mouse.click, and should therefore be
awaited before proceeding in tests to make sure that the test's behavior
is deterministic and avoid intermittent failures.
The following command was used to find potential places to fix:
`grep -nEr "[^await|return] page\." test/integration/*`
The clipboard, used via the `copyImage` helper function, is a shared
resource, so access to it cannot happen concurrently because it could
result in tests overwriting each other's contents. Most tests using
the clipboard are therefore run sequentially, but only the stamp
editor's undo-related tests weren't, so this commit fixes the issue
by running those tests sequentially too.
This way it helps to reduce the overall canvas dimensions and make the rendering faster.
The drawback is that when scrolling, the page can be blurry in waiting for the rendering.
The default value is 200% on desktop and will be 100% for GeckoView.
This integration test fails intermittently because the undo button can
only be activated if focus can be put on it, and that in turn can only
happen if it's visible. The test tried to make sure that the undo bar
is visible, but checking for the absence of the `hidden` attribute is
unfortunately not enough to assert visibility according to Puppeteer
documentation [1]. Moreover, the undo button wasn't checked at all.
To fix the issue we let Puppeteer do the visibility detection for the
undo bar by providing the `visible: true` option to `waitForSelector`
[2]. This is consistent with the other tests that already do this, and
also with the existing code that detects if the undo bar is hidden
(which uses the `hidden: true` option of `waitForSelector`). Moreover,
we wait for the undo button to be present before putting focus on it.
For consistency, and to avoid intermittent failures elsewhere, we mirror
this solution to the other undo bar/button tests of the various editors.
[1] https://pptr.dev/api/puppeteer.elementhandle.isvisible
[2] https://pptr.dev/api/puppeteer.waitforselectoroptions
This is a temporary measure to reduce noise until #19811 is fixed. Note
that this shouldn't be an issue in terms of coverage because we still
run the test in Firefox.
It's no longer necessary after commit 1c73e52 that caused the document
to be closed properly between tests, and this therefore partly reverts
commit 973b67f.
This commit configures Jasmine to no longer run the tests in a fixed
order, which combined with the previous isolation commits avoids being
able to accidentally introduce dependencies between integration tests.
To avoid being able to introduce dependencies between tests this commit
makes sure that we close the document between tests so that we can't
accidentally rely on state set by a previous test.
To avoid being able to introduce dependencies between tests this commit
makes sure that we close the document between tests so that we can't
accidentally rely on state set by a previous test.
To avoid being able to introduce dependencies between tests this commit
makes sure that we close the document between tests so that we can't
accidentally rely on state set by a previous test.
To avoid being able to introduce dependencies between tests this commit
makes sure that we close the document between tests so that we can't
accidentally rely on state set by a previous test.
To avoid being able to introduce dependencies between tests this commit
makes sure that we close the document between tests so that we can't
accidentally rely on state set by a previous test.
To avoid being able to introduce dependencies between tests this commit
makes sure that we close the document between tests so that we can't
accidentally rely on state set by a previous test.
To avoid being able to introduce dependencies between tests this commit
makes sure that we close the document between tests so that we can't
accidentally rely on state set by a previous test.
To avoid being able to introduce dependencies between tests this commit
makes sure that we close the document between tests so that we can't
accidentally rely on state set by a previous test.
To avoid being able to introduce dependencies between tests this commit
makes sure that we close the document between tests so that we can't
accidentally rely on state set by a previous test.
To avoid being able to introduce dependencies between tests this commit
makes sure that we close the document between tests so that we can't
accidentally rely on state set by a previous test.
To avoid being able to introduce dependencies between tests this commit
makes sure that we close the document between tests so that we can't
accidentally rely on state set by a previous test.
To avoid being able to introduce dependencies between tests this commit
makes sure that we close the document between tests so that we can't
accidentally rely on state set by a previous test.
The current text layer approach based on absolutely positioned
`<span>` elements by default causes flickering with text selection,
and we have browser-specific workarounds to solve that.
In Chrome, the workaround involves moving the `.endOfContent` element to
right after the last element that contains some selected content. This
works well in simple PDFs, but breaks when we have `span.markedContent`
elements. Given a text layer structure like the following, rendered
as four consecutive lines:
```html
<span class="markedContent">
<br>
<span>development enter the construction phase (estimated at around</span>
</span>
<span class="markedContent">
<br>
<span>300 MEUR).</span>
</span>
<span class="markedContent">
<br>
<span>Kreate's EBITA increased to 2.8 MEUR (Q4'23: 2.7 MEUR) and the</span>
</span>
<span class="markedContent">
<br>
<span>margin rose to 3.7% (Q4'23: 3.4%). However, profitability was</span>
</span>
```
when starting to select from inside the first line and dragging down
to the empty space after the second line, Chrome will anchor the
selection at the beginning of either the `<br>` or the `<span>` inside
the last `.markedContent`, depending on whether the selection is in
"per-character mode" (i.e. click and drag) or "per-word mode" (i.e.
double click and drag). This causes us to insert the `.endOfContent`
element in the wrong place (one element too far), which causes one
more line to be selected, which triggers another `"selecctionchange"`
event, which causes us to move `.endOfContent` again, and so on, looping
until when the whole page is selected.
This commit fixes the issue by making sure that when the end of the
selection range points to the _begining_ of an element, we walk back
the dom finding the first non-empty element, and attatch `.endOfContent`
to the end of that.
This commit reduces the number of freetext editor integration test suite
failures, in full isolation, from 5 to 0 by fixing the following issues
in the "basic operations" block:
- Most tests relied on the first test to enable freetext editing mode.
For isolation we now do it explicitly in all tests.
- Most tests relied on the other tests having created editors. For
isolation we now create the editors explicitly in the tests themselves.
- Most tests relied on previous tests for the editor numbering. For
isolation we change the editor numbering to the one after initial
document load. Since we can't have state (editors) from a previous
test anymore we can remove various `clearAll` calls as well.
NVDA behaves differently depending if the user is hovering or focusing an added signature.
An aria-description is read in both cases while an aria-label is not.
This commit reduces the number of freetext editor integration test suite
failures, in full isolation, from 6 to 5 by fixing the following issues
in the "create editor with keyboard" block:
- The second test relied on the first test to enable freetext editing
mode and put focus on the page (annotation layer). For isolation we
now do that explicitly in the second test.
- The second test relied on the first test for the editor numbering. For
isolation we change the editor numbering to the one after initial
document load.
Moreover, the test names have been updated to clarify with scenario is
being tested, which came up during comparison of the changes against
commit ea5eafa to make sure that we are still testing the originally
intended scenarios (confirmed by disabling the relevant code from the
commit per scenario and noticing the corresponding test failing).
This commit reduces the number of freetext editor integration test suite
failures, in full isolation, from 8 to 6 by fixing the following issues
in the "move editor with arrows" block:
- The second and third test relied on the first test to enable freetext
editing mode. For isolation we now do it explicitly in both tests.
- The second test relied on the first test having created an editor. For
isolation we now create the editor explicitly in the second test.
- The third test relied on the previous tests for the editor numbering.
For isolation we change the editor numbering to the one after initial
document load. Since we can't have state (editors) from a previous
test anymore we can remove the `clearAll` call as well.
To avoid being able to introduce dependencies between tests, and to
bring existing dependencies to the surface, this commit makes sure that
we close the document between tests so that we can't accidentally rely
on state set by a previous test. This prevents multiple tests from
failing if one of them fails and makes debugging easier by being able to
run each test on their own independent of other tests.
This commit, combined with the previous ones, is enough to make the
scripting integration test suite pass consistently if random mode in
Jasmine is enabled, proving that the tests are fully isolated now.
The integration tests are order-dependent because they rely on input
field state set by a previous test. This commit fixes the issue by
updating the values to match the initial state of the document, which
makes sure that we don't build upon values from previous tests while
still testing the intended logic in the individual tests like before.
By checking for the expected value directly we can shorten the code, and
it simplifies removing the dependencies between the tests in the next
commit (by having fewer places to change). Note that this follows the
same pattern as PRs #19192, #19001 and #18399 and also helps to remove
any further possibilities for intermittent failures.
This integration test fails intermittently because of concurrent
clipboard access due to running the test in parallel in both browsers.
It can be reproduced by introducing `await waitForTimeout(1000)` between
the copy and paste operations.
This commit fixes the issue by running the test sequentially instead,
mirroring the change from commit 0e94f2bd.
Having some interactive elements forces the screen readers to switch to form mode
and consequently they delegate the keyboard stuff to the browser.
This patch sets an aria label on each editor in order to have a better description than just
'application'.
